Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in HDMI Splitter Selection Using Complex Proportional Assessment Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35806/ijoced.v4i2.296Keywords:
Complex Proportional Assessment, HDMI Splitter, Multiple Criteria Decision AnalysisAbstract
High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) technology is used for devices such as HDTVs, Projectors, and DVD players. One HDMI cable can only connect one device, even though, when needed, one computer or laptop can be displayed on several televisions or projectors using HDMI Splitter. HDMI Splitter is an accessory that displays content on multiple screens. HDMI Splitter has been circulated with various brands that offer different capabilities and specifications. Therefore, Therefore, thorough consideration is needed in choosing the right HDMI Splitter. This study aims to build a decision support system with the Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach using Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS). The COPRAS method solves the selection problem by calculating the utility level of alternatives, which shows the extent to which an alternative is better or worse than other alternatives through a comparison process. Based on existing studies, the utility values of each alternative were obtained, namely: Robot HDMI Splitter producing a value of 53.73%, Vention HDMI Splitter producing a value of 65.63%, Bafo HDMI Splitter producing a value of 97.13, and PX HDMI Splitter producing a value of 100%. Hence, based on testing through the black box, the best alternative is PX HDMI Splitter.
References
Borman, Rohmat Indra, Helmi, F. (2018). Penerapan Metode Perbandingan Eksponensial (MPE) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Berprestasi Pada SMK XYZ. CESS (Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science), 3(1), 17–22.
Borman, Rohmat Indra, Priandika, Adhie Thyo, Edison, A. R. (2020). Implementasi Metode Pengembangan Sistem Extreme Programming (XP) pada Aplikasi Investasi Peternakan. JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 8(3), 272–277. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v8i3.40273
Cholil, Saifur Rohman, Setyawan, M. A. (2021). Metode COPRAS Untuk Menentukan Kain Terbaik Dalam Pembuatan Pakaian Pada Butik Batik Hatta Semarang. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), 8(6), 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.202183584
Garg, Rakesh, R. Kumar, and S. G. (2018). MADM-Based Parametric Selection and Ranking of E-Learning Websites Using Fuzzy COPRAS. IEEE Transactions on Education, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2814611
Glenford J. Myers, Sandler, Corey. Badgett, T. (2015). The Art of Software Testing, Third Edition. In Wiley.
HI-FI., S. (2022). Apa Perbedaan Antara Sakelar HDMI, Pemisah , dan Sakelar Matriks? Available at https://www.spacehifi.com.au/Hdmi-Switch-Hdmi-Splitter-Hdmi-Matrix-Guide.
Hutapea, H. R. B. (2019). Decision Support System For The Selection Of The Best Extension Officers Applying The Method Of Additive Ratio Assessment (Case Study: Department Of Agriculture Deli Serdang). The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), 3(1), 5–14.
Jusman, Imam Ahmad, Emi Suwarni, Rohmat Indra Borman, Asmawati, Farli Rossi, Y. (2021). Implementation of RESTful API Web Services Architecture in Takeaway Application Development. International Conference on Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Sistem Cerdas (ICE3IS), 132–137.
Karl A. Hribernik, Klaus-Dieter Thoben Wellsandt, S. (2014). Qualitative comparison of requirements elicitation techniques that are used to collect feedback information about product use. 24th CIRP Design Conference, 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.121
Mantoro, T. (2006). Distributed Support for Intelligent Environments. In The Australian National University (p. 27).
Napianto, R. (2021). Dumpster-Shafer Implementation in Overcoming Uncertainty in the Inference Engine for Diagnosing Oral Cavity Cancer. CSRID (Computer Science Research and Its Development Journal), 13(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.22303/csrid.13.1.2021.46-54
Organ, Arzu, E. Y. (2016). Performance Evaluation of Research Assistants by Copras Method. European Scientific Journal, Special Ed, 102–109.
Roberts, F. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Jenis, Kelebihan , dan Kekurangan . Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated. Available at https://books.google.co.id/books?Id=1_qfzgEACAAJ.
Sahir, S. H. (2019). Determination of Cooperative Loan Funds Recipients Using Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) Method. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Multidisciplinary and Its Applications. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-12-2019.2290845
Sànchez-Marrè., M. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Cerdas. Available at https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Qt-azgEACAAJ.
Sihite, T. Y. M. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Nelayan Terbaik Penerapan Metode Copras. Jurnal Informasi Dan Teknologi Ilmiah (INTI), 7(2), 106–110.
Siregar, Alwali Daini Udda, Nelly Astuti Hasibuan, F. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Marketing Terbaik di PT. Alfa Scorph Menggunakan Metode COPRAS. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (JSON), 2(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.30865/json.v2i1.2455
T. Shin, D. (2021). Desain dan Analisis Konektor HDMI 2.1 untuk Pengurangan Crosstalk Menggunakan Tab dan Tab Terbalik. Konferensi Ke-30 Tentang Kinerja Listrik Dari Pengemasan Dan Sistem Elektronik (EPEPS), 20–23.
Vytautas, B. (2015). Assessment of neglected areas in Vilnius city using MCDM and COPRAS methods. Procedia Engineering, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.004
X. Peng, YS Geng, and F. N. (2020). Desain Pengontrol Bus CEC Berdasarkan Antarmuka HDMI. Konferensi Internasional Ke-7 Tentang Ilmu Informasi Dan Teknik Kontrol (ICISCE), 1827–1831. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCE50968.200.00359
