Effect of Chip Breaker Geometries on Cutting Force A Finite Element Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35806/ijoced.v7i1.505Keywords:
Chip breaker geometry, Cutting force optimization, Finite element analysis, Taguchi method, Tool designAbstract
Continuous chip formation during metal cutting operations poses substantial challenges, from deteriorating surface finish to accelerated tool wear. Our research examines how six chip breaker geometric parameters of insert rake angle, land, radius, width, height, and nose radius influence cutting forces in turning operations. Using DEFORM-3D, we simulated 27 distinct chip breaker configurations based on Taguchi's L27 orthogonal array while maintaining constant cutting parameters of 275 mm/min speed, 0.2 mm/rev feed, and 1.0 mm depth. ANOVA findings showed that nose radius was most influential with F-ratio equal to 27.41, followed by insert width and rake angle. The optimized geometry of the rake angle is 16°, the land is 0.1 mm, the radius is 0.5 mm, width is 2.0 mm, height is 0.25 mm, and the nose radius is 0.8 mm achieved the lowest cutting force of 798 N, a 15.8% reduction from the experimental average. This research replaces traditional trial-and-error approaches with systematic optimization, providing manufacturers with specific guidelines for enhancing chip control, surface quality, and tool life in industrial applications.
References
Buchkremer, S., Klocke, F., & Veselovac, D. (2016). 3D FEM simulation of chip breakage in metal cutting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82(1), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7383-9
Cascón, I., Sarasua, & Elkaseer, A. (2019). Tailored Chip Breaker Development for Poly crystalline Diamond Inserts: FEM-Based Design and Validation. Applied Sciences, 9, 4117. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194117
Devotta, A. M. (2020). Improved finite element modeling for chip morphology prediction in machining of C45E steel. University West.
Gurbuz, H., Kurt, A., Çiftçi, İ., & Şeker, U. (2011). The Influence of Chip Breaker Geometry on Tool Stresses in Turning. Strojniski Vestnik, 57, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2009.191
Kim, H.-G., Sim, J.-H., & Kweon, H. J. (2009). Performance evaluation of chip breaker utilizing neural network. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 647–656. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:108955911
Pacella, M. (2019). A new low-feed chip breaking tool and its effect on chip morphology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03961-2
Shamoto, E., Aoki, T., Sencer, B., Suzuki, N., Hino, R., & Koide, T. (2011). Control of chip flow with guide grooves for continuous chip disposal and chip-pulling turning. CIRP Annals, 60(1), 125–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.081
Shinozuka, J., Obikawa, T., & Shirakashi, T. (1996). Chip breaking analysis from the viewpoint of the optimum cutting tool geometry design. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 62(4), 345–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02433-8
Wu, L., Liu, J., Ren, Y., Yang, Z., Wang, G., Sun, J., Song, J., Xu, W., & Liu, X. (2020). 3D FEM simulation of chip breakage in turning AISI1045 with complicate-grooved insert. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 108(5), 1331–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05460-1
Ye, Z., Lv, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Design of chip breaker and study on cutting performance in reaming 7050 aluminum alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 116, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07393-9
Yılmaz, Y., & Kıyak, M. (2020). Investigation of Chip Breaker and Its Effect in Turning Operations. Journal of Advances in Manufacturing Engineering, 1(1), 29–37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jame/issue/65465/1011877
Zhang, X., Li, M., Soo, S., & Yang, X. (2024). Effects of chip breaker groove and tool nose radius on progressive tool wear and behavior when turning GH3536 nickel-based superalloys. Tribology International, 197, 109806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2024.109806