NURTURING TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINED GROWTH: ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46273/jobe.v10i2.309Keywords:
Triple-Helix; Universities; Technology; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Incubator; T-hubAbstract
At a theoretical level, the triple helix model has been developed and understood by scholars for the last two decades. The interdependence and the interplay among the government – academia-industry, both at a theoretical as well as empirical level is well established. Researchers have focused on different stages of the triple helix model, wherein the first stage is denoted as the statist model. This paper tries to understand and express the application of the Triple Helix Model in the case of T-Hub, an incubator in India and its success due to its interplay with universities. An embedded single case study approach has been used to understand the interaction between local government, academic institutions, and the industry. The case shows the strategic application of the Triple Helix Model for encouraging entrepreneurial activity at Hyderabad by the Government of Telangana for optimum results by bringing together universities, industry, and the state apparatus.
References
Abd Razak, A. & White, G. (2015). The Triple Helix Model for Innovation: A holistic exploration of barriers and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7(3), 278-291.
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173-1190.
Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Vang, J. (2007). Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: implications for regional innovation policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2-5), 140-155.
Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press.
Brannback, M., Carsrud, A., Krueger Jr., N., & Elfving, J. (2008). Challenging the triple helix model of regional innovation systems: A venture-centric model. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(3), 257-277.
Cai, Y. & Liu, C. (2014). The roles of universities in fostering knowledge-intensive clusters in Chinese regional innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 15-29.
Cai, Y. (2014). Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-Western context: an institutional logics perspective. Triple Helix, 1(1), 1.
Chacko, E. (2007). From brain drain to brain gain: reverse migration to Bangalore and Hyderabad, India’s globalizing high tech cities. GeoJournal, 68(2-3), 131-140.
Ciapuscio, H (1994) Rethinking technological policy: homage to Jorge A. Sábato. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires. ISBN 950-602-316-6.
Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5-16.
Das, D. (2015). Hyderabad: Visioning, restructuring and making of a high-tech city. Cities, 43, 48-58.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 2-5.
Etzkowitz, H., & Carvalho de Mello, J. M. (2004). The rise of a triple helix culture: Innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 2(3), 159-171.
Etzkowitz, H. & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Godin, B. & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research policy, 29(2), 273-278.
Grondeau, A. (2007). Formation and emergence of ICT clusters in India: The case of Bangalore and Hyderabad. GeoJournal, 68(1), 31-40.
Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor. 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011, 7.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (February 2012). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Springer.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and public policy, 25(3), 195-203.
Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., Ivanova, I., & Meyer, M. (2017). The measurement of synergy in innovation systems: Redundancy generation in a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-08, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., & Asheim, B. (2008). Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster. Environment and planning A, 40(5), 1040-1056.
Pattnaik, P. N. & Pandey, S. C. (2014). University spinoffs: What, why, and how? Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 44-50.
Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry And Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.
Sábato, J. & Botana, N. (1968, November). La Ciencia y la Tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Estudio Prospectivo sobre América Latina y el Orden Mundial en la Década del 1990. In The World Order Models Conference.
Saberwal, G. (2006). New pharma-biotech company formation in India. Nature Biotechnology, 24(5), 499-501.
Safiullin, L. N., Fatkhiev, A. M., & Grigorian, K. A. (2014). The triple helix model of innovation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(18), 203-203.
Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 142-152.
Sonderegger, P. & Täube, F. (2010). Cluster life cycle and diaspora effects: Evidence from the Indian IT cluster in Bangalore. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 383-397.
Subrahmanya, M. H. B. (2017). Comparing the entrepreneurial ecosystems for technology startups in Bangalore and Hyderabad, India. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7), 47-62.
.Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative inquiry, 17(6), 511-521.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Zheng, C. & Hu, M. C. (2018). An exploration of the application of universities as artificial institutional entrepreneurs: The case of China. Journal of Public Affairs, 18(1), e1697.
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173-1190.
Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Vang, J. (2007). Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: implications for regional innovation policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2-5), 140-155.
Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press.
Brannback, M., Carsrud, A., Krueger Jr., N., & Elfving, J. (2008). Challenging the triple helix model of regional innovation systems: A venture-centric model. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(3), 257-277.
Cai, Y. & Liu, C. (2014). The roles of universities in fostering knowledge-intensive clusters in Chinese regional innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 15-29.
Cai, Y. (2014). Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-Western context: an institutional logics perspective. Triple Helix, 1(1), 1.
Chacko, E. (2007). From brain drain to brain gain: reverse migration to Bangalore and Hyderabad, India’s globalizing high tech cities. GeoJournal, 68(2-3), 131-140.
Ciapuscio, H (1994) Rethinking technological policy: homage to Jorge A. Sábato. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires. ISBN 950-602-316-6.
Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5-16.
Das, D. (2015). Hyderabad: Visioning, restructuring and making of a high-tech city. Cities, 43, 48-58.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 2-5.
Etzkowitz, H., & Carvalho de Mello, J. M. (2004). The rise of a triple helix culture: Innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 2(3), 159-171.
Etzkowitz, H. & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Godin, B. & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research policy, 29(2), 273-278.
Grondeau, A. (2007). Formation and emergence of ICT clusters in India: The case of Bangalore and Hyderabad. GeoJournal, 68(1), 31-40.
Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor. 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011, 7.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (February 2012). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Springer.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and public policy, 25(3), 195-203.
Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., Ivanova, I., & Meyer, M. (2017). The measurement of synergy in innovation systems: Redundancy generation in a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-08, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., & Asheim, B. (2008). Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster. Environment and planning A, 40(5), 1040-1056.
Pattnaik, P. N. & Pandey, S. C. (2014). University spinoffs: What, why, and how? Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 44-50.
Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry And Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.
Sábato, J. & Botana, N. (1968, November). La Ciencia y la Tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Estudio Prospectivo sobre América Latina y el Orden Mundial en la Década del 1990. In The World Order Models Conference.
Saberwal, G. (2006). New pharma-biotech company formation in India. Nature Biotechnology, 24(5), 499-501.
Safiullin, L. N., Fatkhiev, A. M., & Grigorian, K. A. (2014). The triple helix model of innovation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(18), 203-203.
Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 142-152.
Sonderegger, P. & Täube, F. (2010). Cluster life cycle and diaspora effects: Evidence from the Indian IT cluster in Bangalore. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 383-397.
Subrahmanya, M. H. B. (2017). Comparing the entrepreneurial ecosystems for technology startups in Bangalore and Hyderabad, India. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7), 47-62.
.Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative inquiry, 17(6), 511-521.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Zheng, C. & Hu, M. C. (2018). An exploration of the application of universities as artificial institutional entrepreneurs: The case of China. Journal of Public Affairs, 18(1), e1697.
Downloads
Published
2022-12-26
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
NURTURING TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINED GROWTH: ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES (P. N. Pattnaik & B. Patnaik , Trans.). (2022). Journal of Business And Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.46273/jobe.v10i2.309
